intox Gaming

(07-31-2011 09:30 PM)Toxin Wrote: [ -> ]I only have 3, i missed click on the poll

You're in luck because the other three people are legit and at least one will provide for us an image.

Last time I went to Universal Studios in FL, the finger ticket scanners wouldn't work on any of my fingers even after the same machine scanned my entire family before me... Felt like Neo.

How can this be this is IMPOSSIBLE

(08-16-2011 10:21 AM)Mr. Coffee Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-31-2011 09:30 PM)Toxin Wrote: [ -> ]I only have 3, i missed click on the poll

You're in luck because the other three people are legit and at least one will provide for us an image.

I'm late...What do. Also I checked again to make sure, and apparently whenever I checked it was in the dark so I couldn't tell the difference, I have 2 loops which is my middle and index finger on my right hand

(08-16-2011 02:33 PM)PlagueBringer Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-16-2011 10:21 AM)Mr. Coffee Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-31-2011 09:30 PM)Toxin Wrote: [ -> ]I only have 3, i missed click on the poll

You're in luck because the other three people are legit and at least one will provide for us an image.

I'm late...What do. Also I checked again to make sure, and apparently whenever I checked it was in the dark so I couldn't tell the difference, I have 2 loops which is my middle and index finger on my right hand

That's ok, between Hawf Wit and Jared someone must be telling the truth.

I'm conflicted as to weather I should take action over something so petty but none of you four have either found a scanner or admitted to lying. I'm not saying any of you necessarily did, but I don't buy that you all miss-clicked.

I've got six whorls, three arches, and one I have know idea because I had stitches in my thumb which destroyed the thumbprint.

Hawf Wit? Jared?

I can inspect hawfs hands and give you a report if it so pleases you?

It's rare enough that I would still like an image; you are, however, clear to confirm Hawf as either lying or mistaken.

Admittedly I could be missing some weird genetic component; if not the published chance is .3^10, about 1 in 170,000

This means, with 45 votes now, the chance of even one person having 10 is 45 * .3^10 or .027%

As demonstrated by the two known 'accidental votes' the chances of 4 10's among 45 is (45 * .3^10) ^ 4 or .0000000000005 %

I'll even toss in a $15 bounty on that image as an act of good faith.

wait, do double whorls count? i have 2 double whorls and they are only something like a 5% chance... both are on my thumbs